Biodiversity loss due to tropical forest fragmentation:conservation in a modified lan

This discussion topic submitted by Beth Krisko at 12:56 pm on 3/21/00. Additions were last made on Friday, May 17, 2002.

Clearing of tropical forests has created a highly modified landscape where remnant patches of native flora are set in a matrix of agricultural lands and urban-residential development (Turner 1996, Williams-Linera et al 1998, Holl 1999). Deforestation of tropical forests has been rapid and extensive; between 1981 and 1990, the total loss of natural tropical forests was 154 ha, cleared at a rate of nearly 1% per year (Whitmore 1997). The vast majority of clearing in Latin America is for agricultural purposes, including both grazing and cultivation (Holl 1999). Loss of biodiversity in the tropics is directly related to forest clearing, which decreases total habitat area (Dale et al 1994). However, the effect of deforestation, changing landscape pattern, also negatively impacts biodiversity. Fragmentation causes remnant vegetation patches to be situated in different positions in the landscape, varying in size, shape, isolation (Sunders et al. 1990), and time since excision from the continuous forest (Turner 1996). These factors, in turn, influence the biodiversity of a fragment, "and in a complex manner, the biodiversity of the collection of fragments that occupies the landscape" (Turner 1996, p. 201). Despite negative effects caused by fragmentation, conservation in the modified tropical landscape must asses individual forest fragment's contributions to the protection of biodiversity. Management regimes can then be established to control the effects of fragmentation, so that remnant patches successfully maintain their natural qualities. In addition to protecting the native flora within patches, ecological restorative efforts should be applied to matrix lands (Lamb 1997), therefore, creating better connectivity between them.

I. Introduction
II. Fragmentation inducesÖÖ
A. Edge effects-- Patch size and patch shape influences forest edge to interior ratio. The forest edge, itself, and the amount of edge interacting with anthropogenic clearing influence ecological structure of forest remnant.
1. microclimate-temperature, light availability (Kapos et al 1997, Saunders et al. 1991, Turner 1996, Turton 1997)
2. wind damage (Laurence 1997, Saunders et al. 1991)
B. Isolation (landscape configuration)
1. Habitat isolation-isolation may reduce immigration of fauna, influencing the species richness of tropical forest fragments (Turner et al. 1996)
2. Landscape configuration of isolated remnants influences seed dispersal (Harrison 1999)
2. Time since isolation-diversity is lost with increasing time since isolation (Saunders et al. 1991, Turner et al. 1996)
III. Conclusion
A. Summarization of fragmentation impacts on biodiversity
B. Translate relevant literature on fragmentation into applicable information for conservation in the modified tropical landscape (Lamb 1997)

Dale, V.H., S.M. Pearson, H.L. Offerman, and R.V. O'Neill. 1994. Relating patterns of
land-use change to faunal biodiversity in the Central Amazon. Conservation Biology 8 (4): 1027-1036
Forman, R.T. 1995. Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge
University Press, New York.

Godron, M. and R.T.T. Forman. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New
Harrison, S. and Emilio Bruna. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale
conservation: what do we know for sure?. Ecography 22: 225-232
Holl, K.D. 1999. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture:
seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil. Biotropia 31 (2): 229-242
Kapos, V., E. wandelli, J.L. Camargo, and G. Ganade. 1997. Edge-related changes in
Environment and plant responses due to forest fragmentation in central
Amazonia. In: Laurence W.F. and Bierregaard, Jr., R.O. (Editors), Tropical forest
remnants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Lamb, D. J. Parrotta, R. Keenan, and N. Tucker. 1997. Rejoining habitat remnants;
restoring degraded rainforest lands. In: Laurence W.F. and Bierregaard, Jr., R.O. (Editors), Tropical forest remnants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Laurence, W.F., L.V. Ferreira, J.M. Rankin-DE Merona, and S.G. Laurance. 1998. Rain
forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79 (6): 2032-2042
Oosterhoorn, M., M. Kappelle. 2000. Vegetation structure and composition along an
interior-edge-exterior gradient in a Costa Rican montane cloud forest. Forest Ecology and Management 126: 291-307
Saunders, D.A., H.J. Hobbs, C.R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of
Ecosystem Fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5 (1): 18-27
Turner, I.M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rain forest: a review of the
evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 200-209
Turton, S.M. and H.J. Freiburger. 1997 Edge and aspect effects on the mircroclimate of
small tropical forest remnant on the Atherton Tableland, Northeaster Aulstralia.
In: Laurence W.F. and Bierregaard, Jr., R.O. (Editors), Tropical forest remnants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Whitmore, T.C. 1997. Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss, pp.
2-28. In: Laurence W.F. and Bierregaard, Jr., R.O. (Editors), Tropical forest
remnants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Williams-Linera, G., V. Domiguez-Gastelu, and M.E. Garcia-Zurita. 1998.
Microenvironment and floristics of different edges in a fragmented tropical rainforest. Conservation Biology 12 (5): 1091-1102

Next Article
Previous Article
Return to Topic Menu

Here is a list of responses that have been posted to your discussion topic...

Important: Press the Browser Reload button to view the latest contribution.

If you would like to post a response to this topic, fill out this form completely...

Response Title:

Optional: For Further Info on this Topic, Check out this WWW Site:
Response Text:

Article complete. Click HERE to return to the Research Menu.

It is 1:13:48 PM on Friday, November 27, 2020. Last Update: Friday, May 17, 2002